From: | "Luis Alberto Amigo Navarro" <lamigo(at)atc(dot)unican(dot)es> |
---|---|
To: | "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, <bruc(at)acm(dot)org> |
Cc: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Question about LWLockAcquire's use of semaphores instead |
Date: | 2002-07-30 15:23:53 |
Message-ID: | 010901c237dd$1e12bdc0$cab990c1@atc.unican.es |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: <bruc(at)acm(dot)org>
Cc: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>; <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
>
> We would have to understand how the SGI code is better than our existing
> code on SMP machines.
>
I've been searching for data from SGI's Origin presentation to illustrate
what am I saying, this graph only covers Memory bandwith, but take present
that as distance between nodes increase, memory access latency is also
increased:
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
image/png | 26.8 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-07-30 15:25:37 | Re: Weird manual page |
Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2002-07-30 15:23:17 | Re: Password sub-process ... |