| From: | Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) |
| Date: | 2001-07-19 04:11:54 |
| Message-ID: | 01071900115403.16433@lorc.wgcr.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wednesday 18 July 2001 07:49 pm, Tom Lane wrote:
> I don't think we should discourage use of OIDs quite as vigorously
> as you propose ;-).
Just playing devil's advocate. As I said, I am one who is using OID's in a
client now.... but who is willing to forgo that feature for large-system
stability.
> All I want is to not expend OIDs on things that
> have no need for one. That, together with clarifying exactly how
> unique OIDs should be expected to be, seems to me that it will solve
> 99% of the problem.
99% solved for 1% effort... The other 1% would take alot more effort.
I think you're barking up the right tree, as usual, Tom.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2001-07-19 05:33:33 | Re: RPM source files should be in CVS (was Re: psql -l) |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-07-19 04:11:47 | Re: RPM source files should be in CVS (was Re: psql -l) |