Re: 7.1.2 packaging

From: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>
To: teg(at)redhat(dot)com (Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d?=)
Cc: <tmickol(at)combimatrix(dot)com>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 7.1.2 packaging
Date: 2001-06-04 16:45:24
Message-ID: 01060412452400.00911@lowen.wgcr.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Monday 04 June 2001 11:27, Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote:
> Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> writes:
> > The use of the Red Hat init functions success and kin?

> OK, these can be found on more than Red Hat Linux. There are also some
> attempts at workarounds for other distributions.

Which I wrote :-)

In any case, it's not my intent to make your set look negative -- on the
contrary -- you are specifically building for the latest-greatest Red Hat,
which is a Good Thing. But, it is possible for your excellent late-model set
to not plugin so easy on older-model Linux, Red Hat or not. And I try to be
agnostic regarding the dist my set is plugged in to. You have the 'luxury'
of only targeting one distribution :-). Not to belittle your work, as you
take care of more than just PostgreSQL in the dist.
- --
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE7G7sn5kGGI8vV9eERAvawAKDAS8641OEoNgX+KNDQfNaVFTddPACfXZFW
6hjAkG9EFUObuYNfWhW3rQM=
=UI6W
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim Mercer 2001-06-04 16:45:47 Re: template1, can there be a template2/3/4?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-06-04 16:29:08 Re: template1, can there be a template2/3/4?