Re: [RFC] Proposed split of -interfaces list ...

From: Ken Wright <ken(at)cncware(dot)com>
To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Proposed split of -interfaces list ...
Date: 2001-01-18 07:27:41
Message-ID: 0101172316160L.19103@rover.cncware.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces

I agree with the proposed split described below. It does simplify the weeding
process. As for changing -interfaces to -interfaces-misc, it makes little
difference to me. Re-subscribing is not a big deal.

> pgsql-interfaces-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
> - ODBC related discussions
>
> pgsql-interfaces-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
> - JDBC related discussions
>
> pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org
> - libpq, libpq++, python, tcl

In response to

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2001-01-18 08:05:40 RE: [RFC] Proposed split of -interfaces list ...
Previous Message The Hermit Hacker 2001-01-18 03:25:44 [RFC] Proposed split of -interfaces list ...