Re: strange behaviour

From: "Gaetano Mendola" <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: strange behaviour
Date: 2002-04-27 17:15:52
Message-ID: 00d901c1ee0f$2fac84c0$d5a9fea9@GMENDOLA2
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

"Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> "Gaetano Mendola" <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com> writes:
> > It is normal that inside sp_foo() the sp_now() is not anymore called ?
>
> You *did* mark it cachable. timeofday() is pretty much the classic
> example of functions that shouldn't be marked cachable.

Yes I know, but is not so clear why in a select like:

select sp_now(), sp_foo();

the first call to sp_now() is not cached and inside sp_foo() yes,
this behaviour was more clear for me if both sp_now() was
cached.

Ciao
Gaetano

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Doug Needham 2002-04-28 02:58:00 replication
Previous Message Gaetano Mendola 2002-04-27 17:13:17 Re: strange behaviour