Re: Thread safe connection-name mapping in ECPG. Is it

From: "Lee Kindness" <lkindness(at)csl(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Michael Meskes" <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: <shridhar(at)frodo(dot)hserus(dot)net>, "Michael Meskes" <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Thread safe connection-name mapping in ECPG. Is it
Date: 2004-03-07 19:53:47
Message-ID: 00cb01c4047d$e9bfa2d0$2b08a8c0@coulter
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


From: "Michael Meskes" <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>
> Why? What doesn't work? AFAIRC the AT statement does indeed allow a
> variable as connection_target.

Yeah, I was wrong there. I updated the thread test program in ecpg/test to
make use of this functionality - see patch in pgsql-patches yesterday.

L.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jochem van Dieten 2004-03-07 19:55:16 Re: Slony-I makes progress
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2004-03-07 19:26:34 7.4.2 ... all commits in?