From: | "Mendola Gaetano" <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Subject: | Re: Is it a memory leak in PostgreSQL 7.4beta? |
Date: | 2003-09-01 14:19:58 |
Message-ID: | 00ca01c37094$1feb4950$152aa8c0@GMENDOLA2 |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hans-J=FCrgen_Sch=F6nig?= <hs(at)cybertec(dot)at> writes:
> > I can hardly imagine that the backend started working with 9mb of
> > memory. what did you do that PostgreSQL needed so much memory from the
> > beginning???
>
> On some platforms, "top" seems to count the Postgres shared memory block
> as part of the memory space of each backend. If it does so in Mark's
> system then that would be a pretty reasonable initial report.
I'm leaving for vacation so I will not have time to try mpatrol
and see what is going on.
You can find mpatrol here:
http://www.cbmamiga.demon.co.uk/mpatrol/
if some one have time may be usefull try and
see the logs.
Regards
Gaetno Mendola
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2003-09-01 14:26:51 | Re: massive quotes? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-09-01 12:46:09 | Re: Index creation takes for ever |