Re: Is it a memory leak in PostgreSQL 7.4beta?

From: "Mendola Gaetano" <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com>
To: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Is it a memory leak in PostgreSQL 7.4beta?
Date: 2003-09-01 14:19:58
Message-ID: 00ca01c37094$1feb4950$152aa8c0@GMENDOLA2
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hans-J=FCrgen_Sch=F6nig?= <hs(at)cybertec(dot)at> writes:
> > I can hardly imagine that the backend started working with 9mb of
> > memory. what did you do that PostgreSQL needed so much memory from the
> > beginning???
>
> On some platforms, "top" seems to count the Postgres shared memory block
> as part of the memory space of each backend. If it does so in Mark's
> system then that would be a pretty reasonable initial report.

I'm leaving for vacation so I will not have time to try mpatrol
and see what is going on.

You can find mpatrol here:

http://www.cbmamiga.demon.co.uk/mpatrol/

if some one have time may be usefull try and
see the logs.

Regards
Gaetno Mendola

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2003-09-01 14:26:51 Re: massive quotes?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-09-01 12:46:09 Re: Index creation takes for ever