Re: Re: [HACKERS] My new job

From: "Adam Lang" <aalang(at)rutgersinsurance(dot)com>
To: "Lamar Owen" <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>
Cc: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: [HACKERS] My new job
Date: 2000-10-12 14:21:11
Message-ID: 00c701c03457$ac4b77c0$330a0a0a@6014cwpza006
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

May bad... sometimes it is too easy assuming everything open source is GPL.

Adam Lang
Systems Engineer
Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lamar Owen" <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>
To: "Adam Lang" <aalang(at)rutgersinsurance(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2000 10:17 AM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Re: [HACKERS] My new job

> Adam Lang wrote:
> > (Actually, under GPL, any modifications of the code have to be free
also,
> > correct?, so it can't really be proprietised unless they make an add-on
that
> > is private... but then postgres can be run and compiled without it).
>
> PostgreSQL is not under the GPL. PostgreSQL has (and always had) a BSD
> license -- which means there is no license restriction on
> 'proprietizing' PostgreSQL code.
>
> > But, as many others have said, the core team seems to have a good hold
on
> > reality and their ethics, so it probably won't come to an issue. :)
>
> This is the real safeguard.
>
> --
> Lamar Owen
> WGCR Internet Radio
> 1 Peter 4:11

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message bmccoy 2000-10-12 14:26:40 Re: Re: R: PostgreSQL book
Previous Message Jeff Eckermann 2000-10-12 14:18:52 RE: Index on substring?