"Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> "Mendola Gaetano" <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com> writes:
> > "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> >> I've found a number of infelicities in the hash index code that can't
be
> >> fixed without an on-disk format change.
>
> > How can we avoid this kind of mess for the future ?
>
> Build a time machine, go back fifteen years, wave a magic wand to
> increase the IQ levels of the Berkeley grad students?
:-)
> Sometimes we just have to change bad decisions, that's all.
I don't know how much old is the code incriminated but I mean
there is no way to improve the code approved ?
Regards
Gaetano Mendola