Re: 2-phase commit

From: "Hiroshi Inoue" <inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "'Bruce Momjian'" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "'Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD'" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>, "'Andrew Sullivan'" <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 2-phase commit
Date: 2003-09-27 22:19:22
Message-ID: 00b501c38545$67298dc0$3d283ddb@PbgX
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Lane
>
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> You're not considering the possibility of a transient communication
> >> failure.
>
> > Can't the master re-send the request after a timeout?
>
> Not "it can", but "it has to".

Why ? Mainly the coordinator(slave) not the participant(master)
has the resposibilty to resolve the in-doubt transaction.

regards,
Hiroshi Inoue

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-09-27 22:22:52 Re: pgsql-server/src/backend catalog/index.c comma ...
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-09-27 22:05:13 Re: Improving REINDEX for system indexes (long)