sorry for the repeats - no spam intended :-)

From: "Joe Conway" <joe(at)conway-family(dot)com>
To: "Joe Conway" <joe(at)conway-family(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "PostgreSQL Development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: sorry for the repeats - no spam intended :-)
Date: 2001-06-07 05:20:02
Message-ID: 00b001c0ef11$81e53aa0$0705a8c0@jecw2k1
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

> representation of a system object name?
>
> What if I rename the get_seq_name function and move it to
> backend/utils/adt/name.c (and of course change the references to it in
> sequence.c)? Actually, now I'm wondering why nameout doesn't downcase and
> truncate.
>
> -- Joe

Yikes! Sorry about sending that last message 3 times -- I guess that's what
I get for using an evil mail client ;-)

Joe

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martín Marqués 2001-06-07 06:26:52 Re: [HACKERS] something smells bad
Previous Message Joe Conway 2001-06-07 05:09:35 Re: Re: [PATCHES] Fw: Isn't pg_statistic a security hole - Solution Proposal

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marko Kreen 2001-06-07 13:10:45 Re: take 2: show all / reset all
Previous Message Joe Conway 2001-06-07 05:09:35 Re: Re: [PATCHES] Fw: Isn't pg_statistic a security hole - Solution Proposal