Re: constraint modification on todo list

From: "Gaetano Mendola" <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com>
To: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: "Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai" <asmodai(at)wxs(dot)nl>
Subject: Re: constraint modification on todo list
Date: 2003-09-15 21:31:20
Message-ID: 00ae01c37bd0$b7ddb440$32add6c2@mm.eutelsat.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai" <asmodai(at)wxs(dot)nl> wrote:
> -On [20030911 15:43], Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
> >We can't ALTER a table that's already in use when the first ALTER
> >starts, either --- its attempt to exclusive-lock the table will fail.
> >But once you get the exclusive lock, you can (in Postgres) perform
> >a series of operations without fear that subsequently-started
> >transactions will be able to see the incompletely changed state of the
> >table. Evidently Oracle can't handle that. That's why they need to
> >invent combination operations like MODIFY CONSTRAINT.
>
> As my colleague says:
>
> it is indeed a lazy choice, but super safe and that's the goal.

Does your colleague know the Aesops's Fables: "The fox and the Grapes" ?

Regards
Gaetano Mendola

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-09-15 22:30:23 Re: some strange messages
Previous Message tachuelita 2003-09-15 20:36:10 Compiling HP-UX 10.20