Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL

Wow, I didn't realize I was going to open such a big can of worms :-)

Thanks to everyone for putting in their "two-cents worth."
All of the responses have definitely been helpful. And I
agree with Adam, et al, this really doesn't belong on this
list so lets end this thread and move on.

Thanks again.

Tim

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim Barnard" <tbarnard(at)povn(dot)com>
To: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL

On 27 Jun 2001, Tim Barnard wrote:

<snip>
...This is not the same in my book, since I don't care
to run RHL in any kind of production environment...
<snip>

What is it about RHL that various people wouldn't
recommend running it in a production envornment?
I don't have a contrary view, so much as I'd like to
know what's specifically wrong with the RH distribution.
We're trying to decide on a distribution on which to
develop telecom software, utilizing PostgreSQL of
course :-) What other distributions would you
recommend and why?

Tim