Re: svr2/unionfs

From: "Gavin M(dot) Roy" <gmr(at)ehpg(dot)net>
To: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: svr2/unionfs
Date: 2005-11-30 16:53:34
Message-ID: 00FC7393-19C6-4BE6-B29C-3C6FDB68F249@ehpg.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

Sure, or keep it... That netblock is about 80% unused. Just let me
know what you want to do with it, when all is said and done. :)

Gavin

On Nov 30, 2005, at 8:50 AM, Dave Page wrote:

>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Gavin M. Roy [mailto:gmr(at)ehpg(dot)net]
>> Sent: 29 November 2005 17:38
>> To: Dave Page
>> Cc: Marc G. Fournier; Magnus Hagander; pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
>> Subject: Re: svr2/unionfs
>>
>> Of course. I believe this is on the same subnet:
>>
>> 65.19.161.70/255.255.255.128/gw 65.191.61.1
>>
>
> Thanks Gavin - as you've probably seen on-list we're now looking to
> rebuild the VM. Once done, I'll give the old address back if that's
> OK?
>
> Regards, Dave.

In response to

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2005-11-30 16:55:45 Re: svr2/unionfs
Previous Message Dave Page 2005-11-30 16:50:15 Re: svr2/unionfs