Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL

From: "Gordan Bobic" <gordan(at)freeuk(dot)com>
To: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL
Date: 2001-06-28 08:41:52
Message-ID: 008e01c0ffae$6cf8a200$800010ac@localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> Previous to version 7.1, RHL wasn't very secure by default. This is
one of
> the most common complaints I hear. 7.1 can be made quite secure out
of the
> box without any special config -- just leave the firewall config at
the
> default of 'HIGH' -- of course, I've now heard complaints that it is
then
> 'too secure' :-).

What are you referring to when you say "firewall"? portsentry?
ipchains total lockdown setup?

> The 2.4 Linux kernel is a big win for me -- I saw a factor
> of two performance increase on the regression suite when I upgraded
to kernel
> 2.4 over 2.2 on the same hardware -- it's nice for the parallel
tests to run
> in 44 seconds on our PIII 600. Not a screamer -- but not a slouch.

Can you please explain what you mean here? Was it just a straight
kernel upgrade? Where does the performance increase come from? I'm
still running 2.2 and I an trying to hold off upgrading for a while
just to make sure that 2.4 goes through a few revisions and fixes. In
particular, what runs so much faster with 2.4?

Cheers.

Gordan

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Eric Ridge 2001-06-28 08:59:00 Please oh Please stop--> RE: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL
Previous Message Gordan Bobic 2001-06-28 08:36:50 Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL