Re: Disconnected Backends

From: "Glen and Rosanne Eustace" <agree(at)godzone(dot)net(dot)nz>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Disconnected Backends
Date: 2000-12-30 17:28:16
Message-ID: 008b01c07285$e5a22700$0101a8c0@godzone.net.nz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Hi Tom,

> "ipsql"? Did you mean psql? If not, I'm clueless what client software
> you are talking about.

No, ipsql is a Win32 application that is available from
http://www.zeos.dn.ua, it works really well other than this apparent
disconnect problem. I have also had the same problem using the Win32 ODBC
client and MS-Access.

> What does "netstat" show about the state of the connections? What is
> your client code exactly?

netstat still things the connections are ESTABLISHED, which is obviously why
the postmasters are still there. Re: the client, there is a newer version
which I will get. I haven't dug around in the code but is there any form of
inactivity timeout in the postmaster for remote connections ? It might be a
good solution if there was.

Glen.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adam Lang 2000-12-30 18:41:51 Re: MySQL and PostgreSQL speed compare
Previous Message Vince Vielhaber 2000-12-30 16:57:15 Re: DBD::Pg