From: "Rod Taylor" <rbt(at)zort(dot)ca>
To: "Hackers List" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject:
Date: 2002-03-04 18:45:03
Message-ID: 007701c1c3ac$f9582820$b002000a@jester
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Sorry to bug, but its been a week since I sent this message with an
updated Domain patch without any feedback (and the initial patch
received suggestions quite quick).

Are there any further changes recommended or is it good to go?
Supported SQL constructs are at the bottom of the message. Once the
base is approved I'll make alterations to psql, pg_dump and friends to
handle the external elements.

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2002-02/msg00252.php

--
Rod Taylor

Your eyes are weary from staring at the CRT. You feel sleepy. Notice
how restful it is to watch the cursor blink. Close your eyes. The
opinions stated above are yours. You cannot imagine why you ever felt
otherwise.

Responses

  • Re: at 2002-03-04 20:43:44 from Bruce Momjian

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-03-04 19:24:08 Uniqueness of rule, constraint, and trigger names
Previous Message Oleg Bartunov 2002-03-04 18:43:02 Re: PocketSQL

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-03-04 20:43:44 Re:
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-03-04 05:54:40 Re: minor documentation fix