From: | "Rick Gigger" <rick(at)alpinenetworking(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Keith C(dot) Perry" <netadmin(at)vcsn(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Chris Travers" <chris(at)travelamericas(dot)com>, "David Garamond" <lists(at)zara(dot)6(dot)isreserved(dot)com>, "Jeff Bowden" <jlb(at)houseofdistraction(dot)com>, "pgsql-general" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: embedded/"serverless" (Re: serverless postgresql) |
Date: | 2004-01-22 18:26:03 |
Message-ID: | 006c01c3e115$32978720$0700a8c0@trogdor |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
> I'm not sure what OS you're using (I might have missed it in the thread)
but
> I've never even thought about an embedded database because PG runs very
nice on
> my laptop (P III - 850Mhz but I did NOT it new). Now, I'm running Linux
so
> maybe that is the difference. In fact, I'm found it to be invaluable to
take it
> to a client meeting and show not only the high level application gloss but
I can
> also show the guts of a application/web site.
If it were just my laptop that would be fine. But I just can't really
install a full on database server (nor would I feel comfortable doing so) on
every machine that I would need it on.
> Now I do understand the sync'ning issue with the database and I haven't
had that
> issue yet but since you'd have two Pg server's, I would think this issue
could
> be handled one of the replication project that is available or by
something you
> custom build (like a perl script that connects to both systems and syncs
by
> checking for missing pkey's in both systems).
This is not an issue for postgres at this point. I will most likely just
handle the syncing of specific parts of the database on my own.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rick Gigger | 2004-01-22 19:02:03 | Re: embedded/"serverless" (Re: serverless postgresql) |
Previous Message | Culley Harrelson | 2004-01-22 18:10:42 | Re: regex in plpgsql function |