Re: Is function atomic?

From: "Richard Huxton" <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>
To: <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "John Hasler" <john(at)dhh(dot)gt(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Is function atomic?
Date: 2001-07-07 11:21:32
Message-ID: 006b01c106d6$fa8b84a0$1001a8c0@archonet.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

From: "John Hasler" <john(at)dhh(dot)gt(dot)org>

> Richard Huxton writes:
> > All functions take place within a transaction, but since PG doesn't
> > support nested transactions yet you can't roll back the effects of a
> > nested function.
>
> Do you have any idea when it will?

Check the "todo" list in the developers' area on the website - that'll show
what's planned for 7.2

Might be more hands available now though, with the RedHat announcement.

- Richard Huxton

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard Huxton 2001-07-07 11:25:34 Re: view and performance
Previous Message Carlo Vitolo 2001-07-07 11:05:59 Problem with function & trigger