Re: [mail] Re: Windows Build System

From: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: "PostgresSQL Hackers Mailing List" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [mail] Re: Windows Build System
Date: 2003-01-31 19:08:04
Message-ID: 006801c2c95c$15a208b0$1a01000a@rduadunstan2
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


----- Original Message -----
From: "Greg Copeland" <greg(at)CopelandConsulting(dot)Net>
> I'm confused as to whether you are being sarcastic or truly seem to
> think there is a distinction here. Simple question, does MySQL require
> the cygwin dll's (or statically linked to) to run?
>
> If the answer is yes, then there is little question that they are as
> "emulated" as is the current PostgreSQL/Win32 effort.
>
> Care to expand on exactly what you believe the distinction is? ...or
> did I miss the humor boat? :(

I just installed it (their latest gama), to see what was there (and
uninstalled it straight away ;-). There was a cygwinb19.dll (I think that's
what it was called) installed.

In any case, if we are talking about "industrial strength", is this the
comparison we should be using? ;-)

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Curtis Faith 2003-01-31 19:18:29 Re: [mail] Re: Windows Build System
Previous Message Greg A. Woods 2003-01-31 19:07:09 Re: PostgreSQL, NetBSD and NFS