Re: Vacuum columns in statistics tables

From: "Larry Rosenman" <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>
To: "'Peter Eisentraut'" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Vacuum columns in statistics tables
Date: 2006-11-24 01:55:04
Message-ID: 004501c70f6b$9568a910$68c8a8c0@SURGIENT.COM
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Is there a reason why the vacuum tracking columns in
> pg_stat_all_tables etc. were added before the existing columns? I
> find this to be a very inconvenient regression because I use the
> counter columns much more often. What is the rationale for that?

They seemed to make more sense there when I did the patch. I'm not wedded
to it
where it is now.

--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 512-248-2683 E-Mail: ler(at)lerctr(dot)org
US Mail: 430 Valona Loop, Round Rock, TX 78681-3893

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-11-24 02:42:24 Re: 8.2 open items list
Previous Message Mark Kirkwood 2006-11-23 22:08:39 Avg performance for int8/numeric