Re: Size for vacuum_mem

From: "Nicolai Tufar" <ntufar(at)apb(dot)com(dot)tr>
To: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Size for vacuum_mem
Date: 2002-12-06 20:22:12
Message-ID: 002c01c29d65$2933e600$8016a8c0@apb.com.tr
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> On the other hand, I have watched people lazy-vacuum production
> databases in 7.2.* and not seen any visible hit on system load
> (as far as top or vmstat could show, anyway).

From my experience lazy-vacuum never strains system load with
modern processors. It is defenitely IO-bound.

regards,
Nic

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Myk Melez 2002-12-06 20:33:10 publicly available PostGreSQL server?
Previous Message Fernando Papa 2002-12-06 20:20:03 Table functions say "no destination for result data."