Re: Search machine is ready

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: <devrim(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Search machine is ready
Date: 2006-02-15 22:12:03
Message-ID: 001c01c6327c$e43c6547$6a01a8c0@valehousing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www


-----Original Message-----
From: "Joshua D. Drake"<jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Sent: 15/02/06 17:02:00
To: "Dave Page"<dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: "Devrim GUNDUZ"<devrim(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Tom Lane"<tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org"<pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Search machine is ready

Dave Page wrote:
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Devrim GUNDUZ [mailto:devrim(at)commandprompt(dot)com]
> Sent: Wed 2/15/2006 12:50 PM
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: Joshua D. Drake; Tom Lane; pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Search machine is ready
>
>
> The search machine currently has
> MammothPostgreSQL FOSS on it. Which is
> pure PostgreSQL.

I'm not worried about you guys - PostgreSQL is what you do - it's A.N. Other distro that might patch their packages without fully understanding what they're doing.

/D

-----Unmodified Original Message-----
Dave Page wrote:
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Devrim GUNDUZ [mailto:devrim(at)commandprompt(dot)com]
> Sent: Wed 2/15/2006 12:50 PM
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: Joshua D. Drake; Tom Lane; pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Search machine is ready
>
>
>> Dave, why don't you use the vendor packages? I believe Joshua will use
>> Fedora Core, and I'd use vendor Apache, etc.
>>
>
> I was assuming Debian - I could have sworn he mentioned apt at some point.
>
Well FYI if we were using Fedora, we would probably use apt anyway ;)
That being said... It is Ubuntu Breezy.

> - Vendor changes. I don't like to run packages I know to have been changed by the vendor - for example, it was noted the other day that the Debian PostgreSQL packages contains patches that aren't in PGDG releases. In this case the only OS vendor I would trust with a modified PostgreSQL is Red Hat, for fairly obvious reasons.
>
The search machine currently has MammothPostgreSQL FOSS on it. Which is
pure PostgreSQL.

>
>> As a part of WWW team and CMD, I'd be happy to coordinate the stuff,
>> BTW.
>>
>
> Please feel free :-)
>
> Regards,Dave.
>

--
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503.667.4564
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: PLphp, PLperl - http://www.commandprompt.com/

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2006-02-17 14:53:58 Re: Search machine is ready
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2006-02-15 20:13:06 Re: Search machine is ready