Re: More Red Hat information

From: "Gregory Wood" <gregw(at)com-stock(dot)com>
To: "webb sprague" <wsprague(at)o1(dot)com>
Cc: "PostgreSQL-General" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: More Red Hat information
Date: 2001-06-25 17:34:37
Message-ID: 001b01c0fd9d$58a5fd60$7889ffcc@comstock.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Then keep using it free. And the people whose management can't fathom the
idea of using a serious application without an expensive support contract to
fall back on might finally be interested in PostgreSQL. I can't see this as
anything but win-win...

Greg

> I guess I prefer my free software free...
>
>
>
> On Monday 25 June 2001 12:19, Gunnar Rønning wrote:
> > * David Wheeler <David(at)Wheeler(dot)net> wrote:
> > | > http://www.redhat.com/products/software/database/
> > |
> > | $2225 ???? Are they *kidding*???
> >
> > Too cheap for you ? try Oracle pay more - get less ;-)
> >
> > Sorry couldn't resist.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message wsheldah 2001-06-25 17:35:47 Re: Storage limits in PostgreSQL?
Previous Message Lamar Owen 2001-06-25 17:32:17 Re: Storage limits in PostgreSQL?