Re: Search thoughts

-----Original Message-----
From: "Joshua D. Drake"<jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Sent: 11/05/06 17:47:12
To: "Joshua D. Drake"<jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: "PostgreSQL WWW"<pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Search thoughts

> Reposting because I realize that everyone was in bed or heading home
> when this came through:

Huh? Your email vanishes if you aren't there to read it as soon as it arrives? :-)

And, no, I don't mind if you wanna tweak the weights.

/D

-----Unmodified Original Message-----
Reposting because I realize that everyone was in bed or heading home
when this came through:

Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have been doing some example searching with our search engine and was
> wondering if we can adjust the weights a little differently. For example:
>
> ALTER TABLE, first link is:
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/files/documentation/books/aw_pgsql/node203.html
>
> Which although accurate is way out dated. It seems we should weight a
> docs search higher with the current docs having the most weight?
>
> The same happens with many of the commands such as CREATE INDEX...
>
> Joshua D. Drake
>

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly