| From: | "Hiroshi Inoue" <inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | "'Peter Eisentraut'" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | "'Bruce Momjian'" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "'Neil Conway'" <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, "'PostgreSQL Hackers'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: updateable cursors & visibility |
| Date: | 2003-03-29 22:00:06 |
| Message-ID: | 000c01c2f63e$8f70e120$0e283ddb@PbgX |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net]
>
> Hiroshi Inoue writes:
>
> > Must a SENSITIVE cursor see other applications' changes made
> > while the cursor is open ?
>
> Yes. It is immaterial whether the change came from a different
> application or the same one.
If I recognize the standard correctly, SENSITIVE cursors don't
have to see the changes of other transactions.
regards,
Hiroshi Inoue
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-03-29 22:45:18 | Re: Changing behavior of BEGIN...sleep...do something...COMMIT |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2003-03-29 17:04:28 | About snapshots |