| From: | "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Jan Wieck" <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu> |
| Subject: | RE: Big 7.1 open items |
| Date: | 2000-06-22 09:07:18 |
| Message-ID: | 000c01bfdc29$43f717a0$2801007e@tpf.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:e99re41(at)DoCS(dot)UU(dot)SE]
>
> > My opinion
> > 3) database and tablespace are relatively irrelevant.
> > I assume PostgreSQL's database would correspond
> > to the concept of SCHEMA.
>
> A database corresponds to a catalog and a schema corresponds to nothing
> yet.
>
Oh I see your point. However I've thought that current PostgreSQL's
database is an imcomplete SCHEMA and still feel so in reality.
Catalog per database has been nothing but needless for me from
the first.
Regards.
Hiroshi Inoue
Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2000-06-22 11:09:07 | RE: Big 7.1 open items |
| Previous Message | Giles Lean | 2000-06-22 08:47:43 | Re: An idea on faster CHAR field indexing |