RE: Fix for RENAME

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us]
>
> Can someone comment on this?
>

It seems to me that we have to reach some consensus in
order to get a standard transactional control mechanism
to change the allocation of table files. Probably we would
have to separate things into 2 parts.

1) Where to allocate tables -- we would need some encapsulation
like tablespace. It would be better to be handled differently by
each storage manager. Note that tablespace is only an encap-
sulation and doesn't necessarily mean that of Oracle.
2) Where tables are allocated -- only specific strorage manager
knows the meaing and everything would be treated internally.

Under current (file per table) storage manager,#1 isn't necessarily
needed for the implementaion of #2 and Ross has already tried it.
If we could get some consensus on the future direction of 1)2),
we would be able to apply his implementation.

Regards.

Hiroshi Inoue
Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp

>
> [ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us]
> > >
> > > > I'm now inclined to introduce a new system relation to store
> > > > the physical path name. It could also have table(data)space
> > > > information in the (near ?) future.
> > > > It seems better to separate it from pg_class because table(data?)
> > > > space may change the concept of table allocation.
> > >
> > > Why not just put it in pg_class?
> > >
> >
> > Not sure,it's only my feeling.
> > Comments please,everyone.
> >
> > We have taken a practical way which doesn't break file per table
> > assumption in this thread and it wouldn't so difficult to implement.
> > In fact Ross has already tried it.
> >
> > However there was a discussion about data(table)space for
> > months ago and currently a new discussion is there.
> > Judging from the previous discussion,I can't expect so much
> > that it could get a practical consensus(How many opinions there
> > were). We can make a practical step toward future by encapsulating
> > the information of table allocation. Separating table alloc info from
> > pg_class seems one of the way.
> > There may be more essential things for encapsulation.
> >
> > Comments ?
> >
> > Regards.
> >
> > Hiroshi Inoue
> > Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
> pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
> + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
> + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
>
>