| From: | Denis Perchine <dyp(at)perchine(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Chris Bitmead <chris(at)bitmead(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Patch for better large objects support |
| Date: | 2000-06-12 18:13:42 |
| Message-ID: | 00061301151806.07937@dyp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
> > > Will anybody want to use this when TOAST comes to be?
> >
> > 1. There's no any TOAST at the moment.
> > 2. For really large objects TOAST will be really inefficient for quite small < 64K other
> > way around.
>
> This stuff is going into 7.1, and TOAST will be there. Also TOAST will
> not be inefficient for small objects.
Sorry. Maybe my english is a little bit dumb. I said that TOAST will be inefficient
for really large objects. And for small objects it will be much more efficient.
BTW, when 7.1 is planned?
--
Sincerely Yours,
Denis Perchine
----------------------------------
E-Mail: dyp(at)perchine(dot)com
HomePage: http://www.perchine.com/dyp/
FidoNet: 2:5000/120.5
----------------------------------
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-06-12 19:46:57 | Re: Patch for better large objects support |
| Previous Message | Denis Perchine | 2000-06-12 18:11:39 | Re: Caching number of blocks in relation to avoi lseek. |