RE: [HACKERS] 7.0 status request

From: "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Vadim Mikheev" <vadim(at)krs(dot)ru>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] 7.0 status request
Date: 1999-11-23 04:17:29
Message-ID: 000601bf3569$a82b2020$2801007e@cadzone.tpf.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 1999 12:38 PM
> To: Hiroshi Inoue
> Cc: Vadim Mikheev; Tom Lane; PostgreSQL-development
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 7.0 status request
>
>
> > > Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> > > >
> > > > As for cache invalidation(rollback),I may be able to do something.
> > > > However new save point feature would need some change around
> > > > it. I don't know how Vadim would change it.
> > >
> > > I have no plans to implement it for 7.0...
> > >
> >
> > Doesn't ROLLBACK to a save point rollback catalog cache ?
>
> I thought we flush cache on abort, no?
>

Sorry,I don't remember well now.
But at least catalog cache is not rollbacked for the transaction
itself in case of abort.

Regards.

Hiroshi Inoue
Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 1999-11-23 04:35:22 Re: [HACKERS] System cache index cleanup
Previous Message Lamar Owen 1999-11-23 03:58:02 Re: Mandrake RPMs (was RPM build on Suse linux 6.2)