| From: | "Hiroshi Inoue" <inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | "'Christopher Kings-Lynne'" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | "'Dave Page'" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>, <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign |
| Date: | 2003-03-13 15:05:22 |
| Message-ID: | 000301c2e971$f9d57f50$0e283ddb@PbgX |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher Kings-Lynne [mailto:chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au]
>
> > > Obviously there is cost, but doing a lookup only on
> demand, has got to be
> > > cheaper in the long run than including the entire column
> definition in the
> > > message whether it's wanted or not?
> >
> > So if there are 100 fields, should we ask the backend
> > the column name 100 times ?
>
> No, you do a single select that returns 100 results...
Does a single select mean a fast select ?
regards,
Hiroshi Inoue
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Manfred Koizar | 2003-03-13 15:16:29 | Re: [SQL] What's wrong with this group by clause? |
| Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2003-03-13 10:07:34 | Re: Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-03-13 15:19:27 | Re: Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign |
| Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2003-03-13 10:07:34 | Re: Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign |