| From: | "Taral" <taral(at)cyberjunkie(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "The Hermit Hacker" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
| Cc: | "Michael Meskes" <meskes(at)usa(dot)net>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | RE: [HACKERS] More PostgreSQL+CORBA |
| Date: | 1998-11-15 06:29:47 |
| Message-ID: | 000101be1061$577dffe0$8a14f7d0@taral.dobiecenter.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces |
Hear ye! Hear ye!
I've just started stressing my brain on the CORBA 2 docs... It turns out
that CORBA will be completely compatible with the existing system.
postmaster will register a "method server" with the ORB (which is a separate
process in mico, at least). A "method server" is one which requires a
separate process for every method invocation. Which is basically what we do
now with our one-backend-per-connection system. At least until the backend
is thread-safe, we're stuck with it. When the backend is thread-safe, we can
switch to "unshared server" where we have one per database. :)
Taral
P.S. When will that corba-specific list be set up? I'm sure that well over
half of the list didn't care one bit about what I just said.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 1998-11-15 06:31:42 | Re: [HACKERS] BIG grant problem |
| Previous Message | The Hermit Hacker | 1998-11-15 05:38:03 | Re: [HACKERS] More PostgreSQL+CORBA |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | The Hermit Hacker | 1998-11-15 06:41:46 | RE: [HACKERS] More PostgreSQL+CORBA |
| Previous Message | The Hermit Hacker | 1998-11-15 04:51:05 | Re: [HACKERS] More PostgreSQL+CORBA |