From: | "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | "pgsql-hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | cnfify() performance |
Date: | 1999-07-22 01:47:30 |
Message-ID: | 000001bed3e4$28c8b900$2801007e@cadzone.tpf.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi all,
A question about TODO item
* Fix memory exhaustion when using many OR's
pull_ors() and pull_ands() are called while processing
cnfify() and both call copyObject().
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
For example in pull_ors()
return (pull_ors(nconc(copyObject((Node *) args),
copyObject((Node *) lnext(orlist)))));
copyObject() seems too heavy
Is copyObject() necessary in this case ?
Couldn't we change as below ?
return (pull_ors(nconc(listCopy(args),
listCopy( lnext(orlist)))));
I'm not sure it's possible or not ,because I don't understand
cnfify() and other related stuff.
If it's possible,it would improve cnfify()'s performance and
memory consumption in many OR's cases ,though it would
never fix TODO item.
Comments ?
Regards.
Hiroshi Inoue
Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Vince Vielhaber | 1999-07-22 01:48:57 | RE: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] Dropped connection during COPY causes t |
Previous Message | Ryan Kirkpatrick | 1999-07-22 01:39:06 | Re: [PORTS] RedHat6.0 & Alpha |