Re: Winsock error 10035 while trying to upgrade from 8.0 to 8.2

From: "Cyril VELTER" <cyril(dot)velter(at)metadys(dot)com>
To: magnus(at)hagander(dot)net
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Winsock error 10035 while trying to upgrade from 8.0 to 8.2
Date: 2007-05-25 08:17:34
Message-ID: 0-39227343642-2674-1819306@CFGEM
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> > Cyril VELTER wrote:
>
> >
> > > Searching the source files, it seems the error message is generated in
> > > port/win32/socket.c line 594.
> >
> > Right, but the important thing is which path down to that function is it
> > generated in. Which is why a backtrace would help.
>
> Yes, I understand that.
>
> >
> > Looking at the code, the problem is probably somewhere in
> > pgwin32_recv(). Now, it really shouldn't end up doing what you're
> > seeing, but obviously it is.
>
>
> After looking at the code of pgwin32_recv(), I don't understand why
> pgwin32_waitforsinglesocket() is called with the FD_ACCEPT argument.
>
> >
> > Perhaps we just need to have it retry if it gets the WSAEWOULDBLOCK?
> > Thoughts?
>
> I've modified pgwin32_recv() to do that (repeat the
> pgwin32_waitforsinglesocket() / WSARecv while the error is WSAEWOULDBLOCK and

> not raising this error. I've an upgrade running right now (I will have the
> result in the next hours).

Replying to myself, the upgrade is not finished yet, but I can confirm that
there is cases where pgwin32_waitforsinglesocket() return and the WSARecv
immediatly fail. I-ve modified the end of pgwin32_recv() :

/* No error, zero bytes (win2000+) or error+WSAEWOULDBLOCK (<=nt4) */

for(;;) {
if (pgwin32_waitforsinglesocket(s, FD_READ | FD_CLOSE | FD_ACCEPT,
INFINITE) == 0)
return -1;

r = WSARecv(s, &wbuf, 1, &b, &flags, NULL, NULL);
if (r == SOCKET_ERROR)
{
printf("SOCKERROR");
if (WSAGetLastError() != WSAEWOULDBLOCK)
{
TranslateSocketError();
return -1;
}
}
else
{
return b;
}
}

The printf("SOCKERROR") line have been hit two times.

Any though ?

Once this upgrade is finished, I will make another try removing FD_ACCEPT from

the pgwin32_waitforsinglesocket() call.

cyril

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrus 2007-05-25 08:22:25 Best way to prevent overlapping dates
Previous Message PFC 2007-05-25 08:09:17 Re: index vs. seq scan choice?