| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, ram(dot)maurya(at)lavainternational(dot)in, pgsql-bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #16497: old and new pg_controldata WAL segment sizes are invalid or do not match |
| Date: | 2020-06-27 21:26:10 |
| Message-ID: | 20200627212610.GJ16644@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 09:48:55AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 02:29:43PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 02:11:14PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> >> I do think the doc could probably say replica 'or higher'.
>
> +1. Sounds good to me to just use "or higher" here. The docs insist
> on the concept of hierarchy for values of wal_level.
Instead of mentioning a specific wal_level "or higher", I decided to
just mention the WAL level _not_ to use; patch attached.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com
The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| wal_level.diff | text/x-diff | 820 bytes |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | PG Bug reporting form | 2020-06-28 16:21:39 | BUG #16515: Core dump in libgdal30 |
| Previous Message | Brajendra Pratap Singh | 2020-06-27 14:24:33 | Fwd: BUG #16513: Postgresql HA Cluster |