Re: BUG #15587: Partitions with ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #15587: Partitions with ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT
Date: 2019-01-15 18:26:28
Message-ID: 201901151826.bdqajmm7p3jk@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On 2019-Jan-10, Tom Lane wrote:

> > On 2019-Jan-10, PG Bug reporting form wrote:
> >> ALTER TABLE ONLY t1 ADD CONSTRAINT uniq_t1_i1_i2 UNIQUE (i1, i2);
> >> [ leads to ]
> >> Indexes:
> >> "uniq_t1_i1_i2" UNIQUE CONSTRAINT, btree (i1, i2) INVALID

> I concur that the code is operating as designed. I think however that
> there's a user-experience problem here, which is that INVALID suggests
> that something's broken. I wonder if we could improve matters by
> making psql and the docs describe this state of a partitioned index
> as INCOMPLETE.

Hmm, yeah, I can see how that can be confusing. Not sure of the
difficulty of a fix ... I'll have a think about it.

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2019-01-15 18:42:56 Re: BUG #15587: Partitions with ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2019-01-15 18:24:57 Re: BUG #15587: Partitions with ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT