RE : mod_auth_pgsql 2.0.1 don't close the backend connection

From: "Bruno BAGUETTE" <pgsql-ml(at)baguette(dot)net>
To: "'Kris Jurka'" <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>, "'Bruno BAGUETTE'" <pgsql-ml(at)baguette(dot)net>
Cc: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <info(at)giuseppetanzilli(dot)it>, <g(dot)tanzilli(at)gruppocsf(dot)com>
Subject: RE : mod_auth_pgsql 2.0.1 don't close the backend connection
Date: 2003-10-03 14:46:16
Message-ID: !~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAATBuXKOMvlkWzD3KJN6FWLMKAAAAQAAAA+CM73cHO8U+rW+OsTr2e8wEAAAAA@baguette.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> Yes, the mod_auth_pgsql series for Apache 2 is broken as you
> describe. It does not release the connection, but the change
> is intentional. Looking at the Changelog I see:
>
> - now we reuse database connection, 2x speedup !!
>
> Perhaps this is a good thing with different MPMs, but the
> standard prefork module can exhaust the available connections
> quite quickly as you describe. Here is a patch for
> mod_auth_pgsql 2.0.1 that reverts it to the previous behavior
> of a new connection per authentication.

I'm getting many errors when I do the make on the patched files. Is
there other people that have compiled successfully the patched
mod_auth_pgsql 2.0.1 ?

I've attached to this email the error log. Do you have the same errors
than me or do I have missed something ?

> I have added the maintainer to the cc: list, perhaps he has
> some input?

I don't know, I've written to the maintainer but until now I never
received any answer from him. Is there a CVS somewhere with that project
?

Regards,

---------------------------------------
Bruno BAGUETTE - pgsql-ml(at)baguette(dot)net

Attachment Content-Type Size
make_errors.log application/octet-stream 15.9 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kris Jurka 2003-10-03 14:51:11 Re: RE : mod_auth_pgsql 2.0.1 don't close the backend
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-10-03 14:35:08 Re: Discussion about inheritance