Re: Parallel bitmap heap scan

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rafia Sabih <rafia(dot)sabih(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, tushar <tushar(dot)ahuja(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Parallel bitmap heap scan
Date: 2017-03-08 17:53:23
Message-ID: 9268.1488995603@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 12:45 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>>> I'm getting some compiler warnings in gcc version 4.4.7 20120313 (Red Hat
>>> 4.4.7-17) (GCC):

>> Me too. Fix pushed.

> Thanks. Sorry for the hassle; my compiler isn't as picky about this
> as I would like, and apparently Dilip's isn't either.

Might be interesting to see whether -O level affects it. In principle,
whether you get the warning should depend on how much the compiler has
analyzed the logic flow ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2017-03-08 17:54:21 Re: Need a builtin way to run all tests faster manner
Previous Message Robert Haas 2017-03-08 17:52:33 Re: [HACKERS] [GSoC] Push-based query executor discussion