Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL

From: teg(at)redhat(dot)com (Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d?=)
To: "Steve Wolfe" <steve(at)iboats(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL
Date: 2001-06-27 23:00:46
Message-ID: xuyr8w5bk9t.fsf@halden.devel.redhat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

"Steve Wolfe" <steve(at)iboats(dot)com> writes:

> > Previous to version 7.1, RHL wasn't very secure by default. This is one
> of
> > the most common complaints I hear. 7.1 can be made quite secure out of
> the
> > box without any special config -- just leave the firewall config at the
> > default of 'HIGH' -- of course, I've now heard complaints that it is then
> > 'too secure' :-).
>
> Myself, I'd prefer that they'd just leave the insecure services off by
> default, rather than using a firewall as a "band-aid". ; )

ALmost all services are off as well. Openssh is on, sendmail is on
(but only accepts connects from the local machine), portmap is on and
that's about it.

--
Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Red Hat, Inc.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alex Knight 2001-06-27 23:19:46 Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-06-27 22:58:18 Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL