Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: State of RPMs

From: teg(at)redhat(dot)com (Trond Eivind=?iso-8859-1?q?_Glomsr=F8d?=)
To: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
Cc: Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>
Subject: Re: State of RPMs
Date: 2000-07-23 23:51:07
Message-ID: xuyog3o9zis.fsf@hoser.devel.redhat.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> writes:

> > > Lamar et al: what is the current state of the posted (and upcoming)
> > > RPMs? Did the Mandrake stuff get integrated into The One True SpecFile
> > > (modulo the .bz input files)?
> > They claim they are compatible with Red Hat Linux, so there shouldn't
> > be any problems.
> 
> Hi Trond. There were a few issues on .bz2 vs .gz vs ?? for man pages and
> input files 

No reason to touch those: If no tar.bz2 sources are available from
postgresql.org, it shouldn't be used. Simple enough. If tar.bz2
sources show up, we would be happy to use them.

Bzipping of man pages is useless - and the way to handle it would be
by not compressing at all in the specfile, as you can then handle it
with an RPM build policy.
 

-- 
Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Red Hat, Inc.

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Thomas LockhartDate: 2000-07-24 00:04:29
Subject: Re: State of RPMs
Previous:From: Thomas LockhartDate: 2000-07-23 23:44:51
Subject: Re: State of RPMs

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group