| From: | teg(at)redhat(dot)com (Trond Eivind=?iso-8859-1?q?_Glomsr=F8d?=) |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: State of RPMs |
| Date: | 2000-07-23 23:51:07 |
| Message-ID: | xuyog3o9zis.fsf@hoser.devel.redhat.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> writes:
> > > Lamar et al: what is the current state of the posted (and upcoming)
> > > RPMs? Did the Mandrake stuff get integrated into The One True SpecFile
> > > (modulo the .bz input files)?
> > They claim they are compatible with Red Hat Linux, so there shouldn't
> > be any problems.
>
> Hi Trond. There were a few issues on .bz2 vs .gz vs ?? for man pages and
> input files
No reason to touch those: If no tar.bz2 sources are available from
postgresql.org, it shouldn't be used. Simple enough. If tar.bz2
sources show up, we would be happy to use them.
Bzipping of man pages is useless - and the way to handle it would be
by not compressing at all in the specfile, as you can then handle it
with an RPM build policy.
--
Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Red Hat, Inc.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2000-07-24 00:04:29 | Re: State of RPMs |
| Previous Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2000-07-23 23:44:51 | Re: State of RPMs |