Re: Re: OpenOffice compile

From: teg(at)redhat(dot)com (Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d?=)
To: "Craig Orsinger" <orsingerc(at)epg(dot)lewis(dot)army_mil(dot)invalid>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: OpenOffice compile
Date: 2001-05-28 14:08:06
Message-ID: xuyitilin21.fsf@halden.devel.redhat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Craig Orsinger" <orsingerc(at)epg(dot)lewis(dot)army_mil(dot)invalid> writes:

> In article <200105221405(dot)f4ME5OG13140(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Bruce Momjian"
> <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> > Off topic, but I thought this was interesting. This is information
> > about compiling OpenOffice. Hope PostgreSQL never gets to be this size:
> >
> > http://www.openoffice.org/FAQs/build_faq.html
>
> IMHO, basing an open project on 7.6M lines of code that can only
> compiled on four or five different architectures

That many? OpenOffice hardly compiles anywhere, and it needs an
_exact_ version of the compiler as it tries to do it's own exception
handling. Very strange.

--
Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Red Hat, Inc.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-05-28 14:14:55 Re: Re: [HACKERS] Outstanding patches
Previous Message Hannu Krosing 2001-05-28 09:11:46 Re: AW: Plans for solving the VACUUM problem