7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?)

From: teg(at)redhat(dot)com (Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d?=)
To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: Holger Klawitter <holger(at)klawitter(dot)de>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?)
Date: 2000-10-26 14:20:32
Message-ID: xuyhf5zof9r.fsf@hoser.devel.redhat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-ports

The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:

> On Wed, 25 Oct 2000, Holger Klawitter wrote:
>
> > Pawel Wegrzyn wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > > What is the latest version of PostgreSQL?
> > > Is there something like 7.1?
> >
> > The most recent version 7.0.2. 7.1 is about to come - I am looking
> > forward to it as well.
>
> 7.0.3 is about to come out, 7.1 is about 2 months away yet :)

How compatible with 7.0 and 7.1 be from an application standpoint?
Will applications linked with libraries from 7.0 be able to talk to
the 7.1 database? Any changes in library major versions? The other
way?

The reason I'm asking is that Red Hat wants to maintain binary
compatibility in a for all x in y.x (that's what distribution
numbering means to us, other Linux distributions have other (and
sometimes rather weird) schemes), but I'm also interested in upgrading
the database component.

--
Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Red Hat, Inc.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Victor Ivanov 2000-10-26 14:40:19 Re: phpPgAdmin
Previous Message Wade D. Oberpriller 2000-10-26 14:16:08 Re: Alternate locations of DB's

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-10-26 14:51:35 Re: --enable-multibyte dies (UnixWare 7.1.1)/Current Sources
Previous Message Philip Warner 2000-10-26 12:54:44 Re: Postgres Question

Browse pgsql-ports by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-10-26 19:48:24 Re: 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?)
Previous Message Michel Beheregaray 2000-10-26 13:48:20 shmget failed