Sezai YILMAZ <sezaiy(at)ata(dot)cs(dot)hun(dot)edu(dot)tr> writes:

> Justin Clift wrote:
> > 
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> > >
> > > Sezai YILMAZ <sezaiy(at)ata(dot)cs(dot)hun(dot)edu(dot)tr> writes:
> > > > With Turkish locale it is not possible to write SQL queries in
> > > > CAPITAL letters. SQL identifiers like "INSERT" and "UNION" first
> > > > are downgraded to "ınsert" and  Then "ınsert" and "unıon"
> > > > does not match as SQL identifier.
> > >
> > > Ugh.
> > <snip>
> > 
> > How about thinking in the other direction.... is it possible for
> > PostgreSQL
> > to be able to recognised localised versions of SQL queries?
> > 
> >  i.e. For a Turkish locale it associates "ınsert" INSERT and "unıon"
> > with UNION.
> 
> I don't have any opinion how can solve this problem. But,
> I don't agree with this solution. SQL is naturally English. I am 
> against SQL to be localized.

In response to

• Re: Turkish locale bug at 2001-02-20 08:44:55 from Sezai YILMAZ

Responses

• Re: Re: Turkish locale bug at 2001-03-03 00:11:00 from Tom Lane

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2001-03-03 00:11:00
	Subject: Re: Re: Turkish locale bug
Previous:	From: Martin A. Marques	Date: 2001-03-02 22:10:46
	Subject: Re: PostgreSQL for Solaris packages

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2001-03-03 00:11:00
	Subject: Re: Re: Turkish locale bug
Previous:	From: pgsql-bugs	Date: 2001-03-02 23:24:22
	Subject: polygon insert into r-tree sometimes fails