Re: Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?)

From: teg(at)redhat(dot)com (Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d?=)
To: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?)
Date: 2000-11-02 19:31:20
Message-ID: xuy66m62mt3.fsf@hoser.devel.redhat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-ports

Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> writes:

> Now, J Random slides in the new OS CD on a backup of his main server,
> and upgrades. RedHat 7.2's installer is very smart -- if no packages
> are left that use glibc 2.0, it doesn't install the compat-libs
> necessary for glibc 2.0 apps to run.

Actually, glibc is a bad example of things to break - it has versioned
symbols, so postgresql is pretty likely to continue working (barring
doing extremely low-level stuff, like doing weird things to the loader
or depend on buggy behaviour (like Oracle did)).

Postgresql doesn't use C++ either (which is a horrible mess wrt. binary
compatibility - there is no such thing, FTTB).

However, if it depended on kernel specific behaviour (like things in
/proc, which may or may not have changed its output format) it could
break.

--
Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Red Hat, Inc.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Steve Wolfe 2000-11-02 19:40:07 Re: how good is PostgreSQL
Previous Message Justin Foster 2000-11-02 19:26:10 Re: Memory Leak

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martin A. Marques 2000-11-02 19:32:54 Re: status applications
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-11-02 19:30:44 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/contrib/pg_dumpaccounts (Makefile README pg_dumpaccounts.sh)

Browse pgsql-ports by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jason Tishler 2000-11-02 19:50:28 [PATCH]: Building PostgreSQL 7.0.2 on Cygwin 1.1.4 (Take 3)
Previous Message Lamar Owen 2000-11-02 19:22:19 Re: Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?)