Re: inferior SCSI performance

From: Vivek Khera <khera(at)kcilink(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: inferior SCSI performance
Date: 2003-10-02 20:16:58
Message-ID: x7ekxvcs3p.fsf@yertle.int.kciLink.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

>>>>> "CB" == Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)libertyrms(dot)info> writes:

CB> Unfortunately, while there are companies hawking SSDs, they are in the
CB> "you'll have to talk to our salescritter for pricing" category, which
CB> means that they must be ferociously expensive. :-(.

You ain't kidding. Unfortunately, one of the major vendors just went
belly up (Imperial Technology) so pricing probably won't get any
better anytime soon.

Perhaps one of these days I'll try that experiment on my SSD... ;-)

--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Vivek Khera, Ph.D. Khera Communications, Inc.
Internet: khera(at)kciLink(dot)com Rockville, MD +1-240-453-8497
AIM: vivekkhera Y!: vivek_khera http://www.khera.org/~vivek/

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jean-Luc Lachance 2003-10-02 21:29:28 Re: count(*) slow on large tables
Previous Message Rong Wu 2003-10-02 20:11:21 Thanks - Re: low cardinality column