Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: vacuum locking

From: Vivek Khera <khera(at)kcilink(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: vacuum locking
Date: 2003-10-22 18:44:52
Message-ID: x7d6cpcdsr.fsf@yertle.int.kciLink.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
>>>>> "RN" == Rob Nagler <nagler(at)bivio(dot)biz> writes:


RN> Vendor: DELL     Model: PERCRAID Mirror  Rev: V1.0
RN>   Type:   Direct-Access                    ANSI SCSI revision: 02


AMI or Adaptec based?

If AMI, make sure it has write-back cache enabled (and you have
battery backup!), and disable the 'readahead' feature if you can.


-- 
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Vivek Khera, Ph.D.                Khera Communications, Inc.
Internet: khera(at)kciLink(dot)com       Rockville, MD       +1-240-453-8497
AIM: vivekkhera Y!: vivek_khera   http://www.khera.org/~vivek/

In response to

Responses

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Vivek KheraDate: 2003-10-22 18:46:26
Subject: Re: vacuum locking
Previous:From: Simon SadedinDate: 2003-10-22 17:58:08
Subject: Re: poor cpu utilization on dual cpu box

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group