| From: | akp geek <akpgeek(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: autovacuum strategy / parameters |
| Date: | 2010-04-28 14:37:35 |
| Message-ID: | x2o2024a9fb1004280737gb35a3065uad2e6007bdff1993@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Hi -
don't want to side track the discussion. We have 8.4, which of
AUTOVACUUM PARAMETERS can be set to handle individual table? I ran into
bloat with small table only. Now the issue is being resolved.
Regards
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:20 AM, Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net>wrote:
> Rick, 22.04.2010 22:42:
>
>
>> So, in a large table, the scale_factor is the dominant term. In a
>> small table, the threshold is the dominant term. But both are taken into
>> account.
>>
>> The default values are set for small tables; it is not being run for
>> large tables.
>>
>
> With 8.4 you can adjust the autovacuum settings per table...
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kenneth Marshall | 2010-04-28 14:45:36 | Re: autovacuum strategy / parameters |
| Previous Message | Thomas Kellerer | 2010-04-28 14:20:53 | Re: autovacuum strategy / parameters |