Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance
Date: 2010-04-26 06:52:51
Message-ID: x2n3f0b79eb1004252352pe7892a9eo2f0111eee55dfe3@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 3:25 AM, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl> wrote:
> FWIW, here are some more results from pgbench comparing
> primary and standby (both with Simon's patch).

Was there a difference in CPU  utilization between the primary
and standby?

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2010-04-26 07:21:35
Subject: Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance
Previous:From: Jaime CasanovaDate: 2010-04-26 06:49:37
Subject: Re: standbycheck was:(Re: [HACKERS] testing hot standby

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group