Re: Timestamp operator error

From: "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Timestamp operator error
Date: 2002-02-26 06:13:04
Message-ID: web-810226@davinci.ethosmedia.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

Tom,

> Pretty trivial when it's only the commutation of an existing
> operator...

Which then makes me think of a proposal for Postgres 7.3 or 7.4:

If you enabled delaration of operators as "commutative", you could cut
the required number of operator definitions by a third.

Just a thought.

-Josh

______AGLIO DATABASE SOLUTIONS___________________________
Josh Berkus
Complete information technology josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
and data management solutions (415) 565-7293
for law firms, small businesses fax 621-2533
and non-profit organizations. San Francisco

In response to

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kancha . 2002-02-26 06:35:14 transaction abortion
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2002-02-26 05:42:04 Re: Timestamp operator error