| From: | "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: CHAR, VARCHAR, TEXT (Was Large Databases) |
| Date: | 2002-10-08 15:33:53 |
| Message-ID: | web-1775407@davinci.ethosmedia.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance pgsql-sql |
Ron, Shridhar,
Maybe I missed something on this thread, but can either of you give me
an example of a real database where the PostgreSQL approach of "all
strings are TEXT" versus the more traditional CHAR implementation have
resulted in measurable performance loss?
Otherwise, this discussion is rather academic ...
-Josh Berkus
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-10-08 15:51:12 | Re: [GENERAL] Large databases, performance |
| Previous Message | Ron Johnson | 2002-10-08 15:16:55 | Re: [GENERAL] Large databases, performance |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-10-08 15:51:12 | Re: [GENERAL] Large databases, performance |
| Previous Message | Curtis Faith | 2002-10-08 15:17:28 | Re: Analysis of ganged WAL writes |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-10-08 15:51:12 | Re: [GENERAL] Large databases, performance |
| Previous Message | Ron Johnson | 2002-10-08 15:16:55 | Re: [GENERAL] Large databases, performance |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2002-10-08 15:36:28 | Re: Temporary tables and indexes |
| Previous Message | Ron Johnson | 2002-10-08 15:16:55 | Re: [GENERAL] Large databases, performance |